|
B:52 |
“Conceptual
Divergence – Canons and Taboos – and Critique: Reflections on Explanatory
Categories”. Historia Mathematica 31 (2004), 129–147. Preprint. The original publication is available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03150860. |
|
G:23 |
“Practitioners – School Teachers – ‘Mathematicians’: the Divisions of Pre-Modern Mathematics and Its Actors”. Contribution to the conference “Writing and Rewriting the History of Science 1900–2000”, Les Treilles, 5–11 September 2003. Mimeo, September 2003. |
|
C:38 |
“The Algorithm Concept – Tool for
Historiographic Interpretation or Red Herring”, pp. 261–272 in Arnold
Beckmann, Costas Dimitracopoulos & Benedikt Löwe (eds), Logic
and Theory of Algorithms. 4th Conference on Computability in Europe, CiE
2008, Athens, Greece, June 15-20, 2008. Proceedings. (Lecture Notes in
Computer Science, 5028). Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer, 2008. Camera-ready manuscript. |
|
G:51 |
“When
is the algorithm concept pertinent – and when not? Thoughts about algorithms and
paradigmatic examples, and about algorithmic and non-algorithmic mathematical
cultures”. Contribution to the International Conference on History of
Ancient Mathematics and Astronomy “Algorithms in the Mathematical Sciences in
the Ancient World”, |
|
|
|
|
|
“What Is `Geometric Algebra', and What Has It Been in Historiography?”. AIMS Mathematics 2 (2017), 128-160.
|
C:64
“Guānyú
yōuxiān,
cuòwù hé zhèngquè – gāo dé nà,
‘gāo
dé nà’,
Wú
Wénjùn, yǐjí suànfǎ”
[“On
Being First, Being Wrong and Being Right: Knuth, ‘Knuth’, Wu Wenjun, and
Algorithms”;
Chinese translation by Zheng Fanglei], pp. 82–92
in
JI Yungang & XU Khanlin,(eds),
Lùn Wú Wénjùn de shùxué shǐ yèjī
[On Wu Wenjun’s Achievements in History of Mathematics]. Shanghai:
Shanghai Jiaotong University Press, 2019.
English manuscript.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|